All of the polling showed that Obama was going to win New Hampshire. The hand counts show that he did, but Diebold counts 81% of the votes, and by their count, Hillary was the winner. The closest you’ll see the mainstream media get to touching this story is questioning how the initial polling could have been so mistaken. But the blogoshere is buzzing with the fact that Diebold counted 5% higher for Hillary and 3-5% lower for Obama, as compared with the handcount, check out this example.
Diebold machines are clearly a threat to democracy.